Call the Witness

The grilling continued. Contrary to their normal, know-it-all outlook, the men in black asked the opinion of the man who could now see. He gave it: So they said to the blind man again, “What do you say about Him, since He opened your eyes?” And he said, “He is a prophet.” ~John 9:17

Taking drugs like naproxen creates negative impact on patients. cheap tadalafil 20mg It is better to online viagra india choose foods that get converted into glucose at a slower pace. The viagra online order disease of addiction is complex, having genetic, psychological, physical and non secular elements. The Sildenafil citrate has been sold by Pfizer more or less $ 15.00 per pill, but the medicine is said to have aroused sudden increases in blood supply to the male reproductive system. viagra properien plays a significant role in reducing arthritis pain and inflammation. I’m not sure what answer they were looking for. If you ask someone who has never seen the light of day, and who is now making eye contact with you, what he thinks of the man who performed the miracle, you’re likely to get a rather flattering reply. So, they proceed with what prosecutors are so good at doing – they attempt to discredit the witness: The Jews then did not believe it of him, that he had been blind and had received sight, until they called the parents of the very one who had received his sight, and questioned them, saying, “Is this your son, who you say was born blind? ~John 9:18,19

These guys were good at what they did. They were efficient. They quickly located the parents to try and poke a hole in the story. They were predisposed to not believe in the supernatural abilities of the God they said they believed in. They could wax eloquent about His mighty works of old, but they didn’t want this ancient, historical God invading the present. They wanted a tame God. They wanted an escape clause. Seeing was not believing, with the exception of the man who could now see.